Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40110235›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2025

Evaluation of MACOCHA Score for Predicting Difficult Intubation in Critically Ill Cancer Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.

Atul P Kulkarni, Shilpushp J Bhosale, Kushal R Kalvit, Swapna Cherian, Anjana M Shrivastava, Manoj R Gorade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. MACOCHA Score to Predict Difficult Intubation in Critically Ill: Expectation-Reality Dissonance?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Atul P KulkarniDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5172-7619
Shilpushp J BhosaleDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0290-0526
Kushal R KalvitDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Medanta Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2166-4557
Swapna CherianDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0578-4081
Anjana M ShrivastavaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India; Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5984-1790
Manoj R GoradeScientific Officer, Clinical Research Secretariat, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7708-2321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Tracheal intubation (TI) is often needed in the intensive care unit (ICU) but can have disastrous consequences. The MACOCHA score was developed for prediction of difficult intubation (DI) in critically ill. Material and methods: After Institutional Ethics Committee approval, we conducted this prospective, single-center observational study. Evaluated the ability of MACOCHA score to predict difficult intubation in our ICU. We included 500 adults undergoing TI in our ICU. We collected the demographic data, details of ICU admission, and intubation-related data for calculating MACOCHA score. We used Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version 21) for analysis. The accuracy of MACOCHA score for predicting DI was determined by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistics was used to determine calibration. Results: Since complete dataset was available for 449/500 patients, we analyzed their data. Acute renal failure and shock were the most frequent reasons for TI. Ketamine and rocuronium were most commonly used drugs for TI. The incidence of DI was 13.5% (60/449). There were 30 patients whose Mallampati score was either III and IV, while 84 and 45 patients had severe hypoxemia and coma before TI, respectively. The AUROC curve for the MACOCHA score was 0.659 (confidence interval, 0.574-0.743), suggesting a moderate discrimination. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed moderate calibration (χ Conclusion: The MACOCHA score showed moderate discrimination and calibration in predicting DI in our study. How to cite this article: Kulkarni AP, Bhosale SJ, Kalvit KR, Cherian S, Shrivastava AM, Gorade MR. Evaluation of MACOCHA Score for predicting Difficult Intubation in Critically Ill Cancer Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(3):208-214.

Indexed as

Critically ill patientsDifficult intubationHypoxiaMACOCHA scoreSevere cardiovascular collapse

Identifiers

PMID40110235
PMCPMC11915403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.