ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025
Mobile/wearable digital devices for care of active cancer patients: a survey from the ESC Council of Cardio-Oncology.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Balancing Oncological Care and Quality of Life: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies for Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Oncology Patients: Challenges and Management.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2026Review
- Understanding Cardio-Oncology: A Survey-Based Study Conducted by the Heart Failure Association of the Polish Cardiac Society and the Polish Society of Clinical Oncology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Contemporary management of atrial fibrillation in patients with cancer-the 2025 European Heart Rhythm Association survey.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular impacts of combination cancer therapies in Africa: challenges and solutions.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Healthcare Management in Cardio-Oncology, Clinical Strategies and Future Perspectives: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Atrial fibrillation in breast cancer therapy: does tamoxifen confer a lower risk than aromatase inhibitors?Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Personalized exercise programs in oncology.Oncology reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The Council of Cardio-Oncology of the European Society of Cardiology developed an on-line anonymous survey to provide an overall picture of the current practice on the use of mobile and wearable digital devices in cardio-oncology and the potential barriers to their large-scale applicability. Methods and results: Between June 2023 and January 2024, an online anonymous questionnaire was completed by 220 healthcare professionals from 55 countries. The greatest number of respondents reported that mobile/wearable digital devices have a role in all active cancer patients for measuring heart rate (33.9%), blood pressure (34.4%), body temperature (32.0%), physical activity (42.4%), and sleep (31.2%). In the setting of atrial fibrillation detection, respondents were evenly split between applying these technologies in all patients (33.0%) or only in selected patients (33.0%). Regarding QTc interval monitoring, 30.6% reported that mobile/wearable digital devices play a role only in selected patients. The decision to use the device was taken by the patient in 56.6% of cases and the physician in 43.4%. The most important barrier reported to mobile/wearable device implementation in the setting of cardiac rhythm monitoring and QTc measurement was their cost (weighted average: 3.38 and 3.39, respectively). Conclusion: Mobile/wearable digital devices are considered to play an important role in different settings of cardio-oncology, including monitoring of patients' parameters and arrhythmia detection. Their role in monitoring physical activity and QTc interval appears more nuanced. The most important perceived barrier to mobile/wearable digital device implementation is considered their high cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.