ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025
An ensemble learning model for detection of pulmonary hypertension using electrocardiogram, chest X-ray, and brain natriuretic peptide.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography for pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- Diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension by Integrating Multimodal Data with a Hybrid Graph Convolutional and Transformer Network.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- AI-ECG for Echocardiography Triage in Structural Heart Disease: Evidence, Implementation, and Future Directions.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Delayed diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a known cause of poor patient prognosis. We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model, using ensemble learning method to detect PH using electrocardiography (ECG), chest X-ray (CXR), and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), facilitating accurate detection and prompting further examinations. Methods and results: We developed a convolutional neural network model using ECG data to predict PH, labelled by ECG from seven institutions. Logistic regression was used for the BNP prediction model. We referenced a CXR deep learning model using ResNet18. Outputs from each of the three models were integrated into a three-layer fully connected multimodal model. Ten cardiologists participated in an interpretation test, detecting PH from patients' ECG, CXR, and BNP data both with and without the ensemble learning model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the ECG, CXR, BNP, and ensemble learning model were 0.818 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.808-0.828], 0.823 (95% CI, 0.780-0.866), 0.724 (95% CI, 0.668-0.780), and 0.872 (95% CI, 0.829-0.915). Cardiologists' average accuracy rates were 65.0 ± 4.7% for test without AI model and 74.0 ± 2.7% for test with AI model, a statistically significant improvement ( Conclusion: Our ensemble learning model improved doctors' accuracy in detecting PH from ECG, CXR, and BNP examinations. This suggests that earlier and more accurate PH diagnosis is possible, potentially improving patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.