Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40110150›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2025

Peripheral Perfusion Index for Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.

B Jayaprakash Narayanan, Shoma V Rao, Subramani Kandasamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Peripheral perfusion-guided versus routine fluid therapy in sepsis: A randomized controlled pilot trial.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

B Jayaprakash NarayananDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9120-5295
Shoma V RaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7483-5575
Subramani KandasamyDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7628-5335

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Peripheral perfusion index (PPI), measured via plethysmography using a pulse oximeter, provides noninvasive, continuous insights into peripheral circulation. This study evaluates PPI's potential as a predictive marker for fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients, aiming to reduce vasopressor use. Methods: A 20-month prospective study was conducted in the multidisciplinary surgical ICU of Christian Medical College, Vellore. Patients meeting specific inclusion criteria were enrolled. Parameters including blood pressure, pulse pressure (PP), heart rate, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT VTI), oxygen saturation, and PPI were recorded before and after a passive leg raise (PLR) test. Positive PLR responders received fluid resuscitation, and PPI changes were monitored at regular intervals. The study excluded patients with peripheral vascular disease, burns involving extremities, those on nitroglycerin or other vasodilator infusions, and those on high doses of vasopressors. Results: A 39% increase in PPI was identified as the threshold for fluid responsiveness. Subgroup analysis revealed variability: trauma patients showed a 55% increase, obstetrics patients 41%, and postoperative patients 6%. Notably, the study found that spontaneous breathing and minimal vasopressor requirements enhanced the reliability of PPI as a fluid responsiveness marker. Conclusion: Peripheral perfusion index is a reliable and practical tool for predicting fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing critically ill patients. It offers a noninvasive and dynamic method to guide volume resuscitation, particularly when combined with established hemodynamic markers such as LVOT VTI and PP changes. This study underscores the importance of using PPI in conjunction with other parameters for comprehensive fluid management. Further validation in larger and more diverse patient populations is warranted to confirm these findings and optimize resuscitation strategies. How to cite this article: Narayanan BJ, Rao SV, Kandasamy S. Peripheral Perfusion Index for Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(2):151-154.

Indexed as

Fluid responsivenessFluid resuscitationHemodynamic instabilityIntensive care unitNoninvasive blood pressurePeripheral Perfusion IndexPleth variability index monitoringPulse oximetryShockSpontaneous ventilation

Identifiers

PMID40110150
PMCPMC11915433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.