ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2025
Nucleotidase as a Clinical Prognostic Marker in Snakebites: A Prospective Study.
Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comment on: Nucleotidase as a Clinical Prognostic Marker in Snakebites: A Prospective Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Article
- 5'-Nucleotidase for Predicting Snakebite Outcomes: A Biomarker Breakthrough?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Article
- Biomarkers in Snakebite: Will This be a Reality in Near Future?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Snakebite envenomation is a critical global health issue, causing substantial mortality and morbidity. Snake venom includes various enzymes, such as nucleotidase, phosphatases, etc. which impact physiological functions. However, research on the role of serum 5'-nucleotidase levels in assessing the severity and outcomes of snakebites is limited. This study aims to measure serum 5'-nucleotidase levels and explore their correlation with the severity of envenomation, to better understand its role in predicting patient prognosis. Methods: This is a single-center, prospective observational analysis involving 82 snakebite patients. Serum 5'-nucleotidase levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and clinical severity was evaluated using the snakebite severity score (SSS). Statistical analyses were performed to determine the correlation between 5'-nucleotidase levels and SSS, as well as various complications. Results: Among the 82 snakebite patients, 71.9% were male and 28.1% were female. Most bites (62.2%) occurred during the day, and 83% involved the lower limbs. Recovery was high, with 93.9% discharged, 3.7% deceased, and 2.4% lost to follow-up. A positive correlation was observed between 5'-nucleotidase levels and SSS at both 0 and 24 hours, with correlation coefficients of 0.55 and 0.61, respectively ( Conclusion: Serum 5'-nucleotidase serves as an effective biomarker for assessing the severity of snakebite envenomation and predicting patient outcomes. Its strong correlation with clinical severity scores makes it a valuable tool for improving the prognostication and management of snakebite cases when used in conjunction with clinical assessments. How to cite this article: Kaulgud RS, Hasan T, Astagimath M, Vanti GL, Veeresh S, Kurjogi MM,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.