Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40110143›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2025

Effects of Early Use of Methylene Blue and Vasopressin on Noradrenaline Dose in Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Harshavardhan R Kuri, Ankur Sharma, Tanvi Meshram, Nikhil Kothari, Shilpa Goyal, Bharat Paliwal, Sadik Mohammed, Pradeep Bhatia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Blue Hopes, Red Flags: The Methylene Blue Dilemma in Sepsis Shock.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Harshavardhan R KuriDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0424-6664
Ankur SharmaDepartment of Trauma and Emergency (Anesthesiology and Critical Care), All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9339-6988
Tanvi MeshramDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4625-6357
Nikhil KothariDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9829-905X
Shilpa GoyalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8983-0953
Bharat PaliwalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7588-9017
Sadik MohammedDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0518-8551
Pradeep BhatiaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5082-7151

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the influence of early administration of methylene blue (MB) and vasopressin on the dose of noradrenaline required to manage septic shock. Materials and methods: This study was a parallel, randomized, controlled trial including 74 adult patients with septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Once the noradrenaline requirement exceeded 0.2 µg/kg/min, patients were randomly allotted to group M and group V. Group M received an intravenous 1 mg/kg bolus of MB over 30 minutes, then an infusion of 0.5 mg/kg over 6 hours. Group V received intravenous vasopressin at a rate of 0.04 units/min for 6 hours. The primary outcome of this research was the dose of noradrenaline required to reach the target mean arterial pressure (MAP) of ≥ 65 mm Hg at 6, 12, and 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included changes in lactate levels, urine output, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. Results: The M group required a higher dose of noradrenaline compared with the V group to maintain MAP above the target level at 12 and 24 hours. There had been no significant variation in lactate levels along with SOFA scores between the two groups at earlier time points. However, at 24 hours, the M group had higher lactate levels and SOFA scores than the V group. The V group also showed improvements in urine output at 24 hours compared with the M group. Conclusion: Early administration of vasopressin compared with MB was associated with a reduced dose of noradrenaline required for maintaining target MAP in patients presenting with septic shock. How to cite this article: Kuri HR, Sharma A, Meshram T, Kothari N, Goyal S, Paliwal B,

Indexed as

Hemodynamic stabilityMethylene blueNoradrenalineSeptic shockVasopressin

Identifiers

PMID40110143
PMCPMC11915450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.