ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
A cross-sequential study of academic readiness and coping strategies among first-generation college students.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identifying Learner Profiles Through Universal Screening: Academic Anxiety and Depression in Nepalese University Students.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The transition from high school to college has embedded challenges, particularly for first-generation students. The study examined the overtime relationship and level of academic readiness and coping strategies among first-year, first-generation, and continuing-generation college students. Another objective was to examine the gender differences in the study variable. A cross-sequential design was used to collect data during college entry and 3 months after the baseline assessment. The differences in the levels of readiness and coping were examined based on participants' generation status and gender. Generation status played a significant role in shaping readiness and coping strategies, and this association was more vital for the continuing generation than for the first-generation college students. As hypothesized, the findings show that first-generation college students were less ready and used poor coping strategies than continuing-generation college students at Time 1. However, this difference disappeared 3 months later between the two cohorts. The overall scores of readiness and coping increased from Time 1 to Time 2. Gender comparison showed that irrespective of being FGCS or CGCS, girls were more prepared than boys at the time of entering college, and boys surpassed girls in using coping strategies to overcome academic issues. Limitations, implications, and recommendations are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.