ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2025
Coping with an awake brain tumor resection in patients and their primary contacts: A qualitative study.
Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of a Post-Discharge Care Program for Surgery Patients with Brain Tumor.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The diagnosis and awake removal of a brain tumor is a major life event. A better understanding of the needs of this group of patients and their primary contacts in the perioperative trajectory can further improve care. Methods: Adult patients who underwent an awake craniotomy (AC) in the Erasmus MC, the Netherlands and their primary contacts were interviewed 1-2 weeks prior to surgery and 2-4 weeks after surgery. Semi-structured interviews on the impact of the diagnosis on their lives and coping mechanisms with the AC procedure were conducted. Interview transcripts were analyzed in accordance with the principles of grounded theory. Results: Twenty-one patients and 19 primary contacts were interviewed at least once during this period. Analyses and coding of the transcripts resulted in a conceptual model, distinguishing coping with the disease and coping with specific procedures of AC. In general, participants tended to rely on their pre-existing ways of coping. Situation-specific coping mostly refers to perceiving control, and related to that, trust in the medical team. Conclusions: Patients with a brain tumor and their primary contacts perceive coping with the AC procedure as a part of coping with the disease. Although the procedure may be perceived as stressful, at the same time it offers hope and prospect. In coping with the specifics of the AC procedure, we found that feeling in control and as an extension of that, trust in the AC team were key aspects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.