ArticleWorld journal of psychiatry2025
Acceptance and commitment therapy for enhancing mental health in military personnel: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.
Article in World journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMilitary personnel frequently face unique psychological challenges due to high-stress environments, which increase the risk of mental health issues like anxiety and depression. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) has shown potential in addressing these issues by enhancing psychological flexibility and resilience.
aimTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness of ACT in improving the mental health of military personnel. Through a scoping review and meta-analysis, we quantitatively assess the impact of ACT on psychological outcomes, guiding future research and clinical practice.
methodsRelevant literature was searched systematically from database inception to June 30, 2023, across multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase. The Joanna Briggs Institute's (JBI) scoping review guidelines were used as the methodological framework. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, and publication bias was assessed through Egger's regression test and Begg's funnel plot.
resultsTwenty-six studies were included, highlighting the application of ACT in addressing PTSD, chronic pain, anxiety, and depression among military personnel. The meta-analysis of eight studies demonstrated a significant positive effect of ACT on mental health, with a pooled mean difference of -4.99 (95%CI: -6.53 to -3.45). Despite high heterogeneity (
conclusionThis study underscores the potential of ACT as an effective intervention for improving the mental health of military personnel. Future research should focus on large-scale, multi-center RCTs to further validate these findings, particularly within diverse military populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.