ArticleWorld journal of psychiatry2025
Psychological consistency network characteristics and influencing factors in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention treatment.
Article in World journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA psychological sense of coherence (SOC) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients is important for disease prognosis, and there is considerable variation between their symptoms. In contrast, network analysis provides a new approach to gaining insight into the complex nature of symptoms and symptom clusters and identifying core symptoms.
aimTo explore the psychological coherence of symptoms experienced by PCI patients, we aim to analyze differences in their associated factors and employ network analysis to characterize the symptom networks.
methodsA total of 472 patients who underwent PCI were selected for a cross-sectional study. The objective was to investigate the association between general patient demographics, medical coping styles, perceived stress status, and symptoms of psychological coherence. Data analysis was conducted using a linear regression model and a network model to visualize psychological coherence and calculate a centrality index.
resultsPost-PCI patients exhibited low levels of psychological coherence, which correlated with factors such as education, income, age, place of residence, adherence to medical examinations, perceived stress, and medical coping style. Network analysis revealed that symptoms within the sense of psychological coherence were strongly interconnected, particularly with SOC2 and SOC8, demonstrating the strongest correlations. Among these, SOC10 emerged as the symptom with the highest intensity, centrality, and proximity, identifying it as the most central symptom.
conclusionThe network model has strong explanatory power in describing the psychological consistency symptoms of patients after PCI, identifying the central SOC symptoms, among which SOC10 is the key to overall SOC enhancement, and there is a strong positive correlation between SOC2 and SOC8, emphasizing the need to consider the synergistic effect of symptoms in intervention measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.