ArticleWorld journal of psychiatry2025
Combined microscopic and neuroendoscopic treatment effects on psychological and cognitive outcomes in ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Article in World journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntracranial aneurysms, characterized by focal arterial wall dilation, pose significant neurosurgical challenges due to their potential for rupture and hemorrhage, leading to severe clinical outcomes, including fatality. Patients often experience profound psychological and social impacts, such as depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment, affecting their quality of life. Rapid progression and high mortality necessitate timely intervention. Advances in neurosurgical techniques, including microscopic surgery and neuroendoscopy, offer distinct advantages. Microscopic surgery provides precision and direct visualization, while neuroendoscopy ensures minimally invasive access and reduced tissue trauma. Integrating these methods optimizes treatment efficacy and clinical outcomes.
aimTo evaluate the impact of combined microscopic and neuroendoscopic techniques on psychological, cognitive outcomes, and quality of life in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
methodsThe study focused on 189 patients with intracranial aneurysm rupture and hemorrhage from January 2020 to May 2024 as the objects of observation and analysis. They were randomly divided into a control group (treated with simple microscope surgery,
resultsBefore treatment, the depression and anxiety scale scores, cognitive function assessment results and quality of life assessment data of the two groups of patients at different time points were compared, and there was no statistically significant difference (
conclusionSurgical treatment combined with microscopy and neuroendoscopy has a significant positive effect on the mental health, cognitive function and overall quality of life of patients with intracranial aneurysm rupture and bleeding, can shorten the operation time and treatment time, and provides a new strategic reference for clinical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.