ArticleOncology research2025
Astragalus polysaccharide enhances the therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin in triple-negative breast cancer through multiple mechanisms.
Article in Oncology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of bupleurum-containing formulas combined with chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Synergistic antitumor effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Mechanistic insights into the roles of astragalosides andOncology reports · 2026Review
- m6A modified circPTK2 mediates TNBC chemotherapy resistance.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Co-targeting ferroptosis and immune evasion through small molecules in breast cancer.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2025Article
- Astragalus polysaccharides: structure-immunomodulation relationships, multi-target pharmacological activities, and cutting-edge applications in immune modulation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Regulatory effects of traditional Chinese medicine on the breast-cancer immune microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cisplatin (DDP) has been used in the treatment of various human cancers. However, DDP alone lacks efficacy in treating triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and its clinical application is often hampered by side effects. Methods: The efficacy and mechanisms of single or combined treatment were evaluated using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) assay, Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)/propidium iodide (PI) staining, wound healing assay, trans-well invasion/migration assay, hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining, immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, Western Blot (WB) analysis, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). An orthotopic model of TNBC was used to assess the Results: APS significantly enhanced the anti-proliferative, anti-migratory, and anti-invasive effects of DDP on TNBC cells. The combination of APS and DDP downregulated anti-apoptotic genes (Bcl2 and Bcl-xL) while upregulating pro-apoptotic genes (Puma, Cle-Caspase3, Cle-PARP), leading to enhanced apoptosis. This combination treatment increased E-cadherin levels, decreased Vimentin, Snail, Slug, and Twist levels, and effectively suppressed epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-associated cell invasion. In the orthotopic model of TNBC, a synergistic reduction in tumor growth was observed in mice treated with APS and DDP. Additionally, the combination of APS and DDP induced the infiltration of CD8 Conclusion: The combination of APS and DDP exhibits more potent tumor inhibition and anti-tumor immunity than either agent alone, representing a novel approach to enhance therapeutic efficacy without increasing the side effects of DDP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.