ArticleCureus2025
Potential of Large Language Models in Generating Multiple-Choice Questions for the Japanese National Licensure Examination for Physical Therapists.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction This study explored the potential of using large language models (LLMs) to generate multiple-choice questions (MCQs) for the Japanese National Licensure Examination for Physical Therapists. Specifically, it evaluated the performance of a customized ChatGPT (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA, USA) model named "Physio Exam Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT)" in generating high-quality MCQs in non-English contexts. Materials and methods Based on the data extracted from the 57th and 58th Japanese National Licensure Examination for Physical Therapists, 340 MCQs, including correct answers, explanations, and associated topics, were incorporated into the knowledge base of the GPTs. The prompts and outputs were conducted in Japanese. The generated MCQs covered major topics in general (anatomy, physiology, and kinesiology) and practical questions (musculoskeletal disorders, central nervous system disorders, and internal organ disorders). The quality of the MCQs and their explanations were evaluated by two independent reviewers using a 10-point Likert scale across five criteria: clarity, relevance to clinical practice, suitability of difficulty, quality of distractors, and adequacy of rationale. Results The generated MCQs achieved 100% accuracy for both general and practical questions. The average scores across the evaluation criteria ranged from 7.0 to 9.8 for general questions and 6.7 to 9.8 for practical questions. Although some areas exhibited lower scores, the overall results were favorable. Conclusions This study demonstrates the potential of LLMs to efficiently generate high-quality MCQs, even in non-English environments such as Japanese. These findings suggest that LLMs can adapt to diverse linguistic settings, reduce educators' workload, and improve the quality of educational resources. These results lay a foundation for expanding the application of LLMs to educational settings across non-English-speaking regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.