ArticleCureus2025
Ethambutol-Induced Optic Neuropathy: A Retrospective Study of Incidences and Risk Factors.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pharmacokinetics and Dose Optimization of Ethambutol in Children on First-Line Antituberculosis Therapy: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Neuro-ophthalmic complications of tuberculosis and its treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Longitudinal Observation by Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients Treated with Ethambutol: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Long-term retinal dysfunction following COVID-19 infection: a one-year prospective observational study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Temporal evolution and factors influencing visual function and RNFL thickness in ethambutol-associated optic neuropathy.European journal of medical research · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe present study aims to determine the incidences of ethambutol-induced optic neuropathy (EON) and its associated risk factors in Central Indian tertiary care centers. MATERIALS AND
methodsA single-centered retrospective observational study was conducted. Data was collected from the Directly Observed Therapy Short-course (DOTS) centre after the revised National Tuberculosis Control Program (RNTCP) 2016 guidelines were implemented. The collected data included demographic data, history of underlying diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, HIV infection, and history of smoking. The site of tuberculosis infection, daily dose, the duration of ethambutol (EMB) treatment, onset, and type of ocular symptoms were recorded. We performed regression analyses to investigate the univariate and multivariable associations with different variables.
resultsOf the 1676 patients who received ethambutol for TB treatment, 987 had an ophthalmological symptom unrelated to EON, and 13 developed EON (incidence =0.28%). Demographic and clinical variables considered were age, gender, race/ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), and diabetes mellitus status. Examples of current infection information were chronic HIV and other comorbidities uniquely associated with renal function site/type treatment specific dose/duration ethambutol. Longer treatment duration significantly correlates with greater thickness of the left temporal retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) and thicker average RNFL. Increased peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer (pRNFL) thickness on the left nasal RNFL scan was significantly correlated with ethambutol tablets (or count) (p=0.027).
conclusionThe findings indicate that ethambutol toxicity is indeed dose and duration-dependent, evidenced by the relationship between prolonged treatment and increased RNFL thickness, suggesting heightened risk of visual impairment. Moreover, adverse effects were observed at even lower doses (12.3 mg/kg), reinforcing that no dose of ethambutol is entirely safe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.