ArticleCureus2025
Comparative Study of Early Versus Late Enteral Feeding in the Postoperative Period Following Small and Large Bowel Surgeries.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe timing of enteral feeding in the postoperative period after small and large bowel surgeries significantly influences patient recovery. Traditional
objectiveThis study aims to compare the effects of EEF (within 24 hours of surgery) and delayed enteral feeding on postoperative recovery, complications, and hospital stay in patients undergoing small and large bowel surgeries. METHODOLOGY: A prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary rural hospital over two years, including 70 patients undergoing bowel surgeries. Patients were divided into two groups: early feeding (EEF) and late feeding. Outcomes assessed included the duration of ileus, wound infection rates, anastomotic leaks, feeding tolerance, and length of hospital stay. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square tests and t-tests, with
resultsThe mean duration of ileus was significantly shorter in the EEF group (4.23 ± 1.26 days) than in the late feeding group (5.6 ± 1.4 days;
conclusionsEEF significantly reduces ileus duration, hospital stay, and complications, demonstrating its safety and effectiveness. These findings support incorporating EEF into standard postoperative care protocols to improve outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. Further multicentric studies are recommended to validate these results across diverse settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.