ArticleCureus2025
Clinical Application of Ventricular Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in the Treatment of Ruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the clinical effectiveness of ventricular intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in the treatment of ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms and to explore its impact on intracranial pressure control, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and neurological recovery. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 67 patients who underwent surgical clipping for ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms at Jinjiang Hospital, Fujian Province, between January 2021 and June 2024. The patients were divided into an experimental group (32 patients) and a control group (35 patients). Clinical characteristics, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative changes in ICP, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and neurological recovery were compared between the two groups. Results: No significant differences were found between the experimental and control groups in terms of clinical characteristics, operation time, or intraoperative blood loss (P > 0.05). However, the experimental group showed superior outcomes compared to the control group in postoperative ICP changes, simplified early brain edema score (SEBES) at 72 hours, length of hospital stay, and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores at discharge, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Ventricular ICP monitoring during the surgical clipping of ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms is an effective method for controlling intracranial pressure, reducing postoperative complications, shortening the length of hospital stay, and promoting neurological recovery. This approach offers a safer and more efficient monitoring solution with promising clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.