ArticleOpen life sciences2025
Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of pathogens in patients with diabetes complicated by community-acquired pneumonia.
Article in Open life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the clinical utility and optimal timing of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing pathogens in patients with diabetes complicated by community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The study included 50 hospitalized patients diagnosed with diabetes complicated by CAP who underwent conventional microbiological testing (CMT) and mNGS using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Among the 50 cases, 16% presented no respiratory symptoms. There were significant increases in inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and interleukin-6, with patchy imaging changes being the most prevalent. The positive rates for pathogen detection by mNGS and CMTs were 78 and 21% (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.