Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40109754›Full record

ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2025

Application of a Nociceptive Test Battery to Assess Potential Synergy between Two Analgesics in Healthy Subjects.

Wouter Alexander Bakker, Monir Bertayli, Daniël Benjamin Dumas, Jeroen Elassaiss-Schaap, Maria Joanna Juachon, Karen Broekhuizen, Hemme Jacob Hijma, Geert Jan Groeneveld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wouter Alexander BakkerCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden 2333 CL, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9255-4542
Monir BertayliCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden 2333 CL, The Netherlands.
Daniël Benjamin DumasCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden 2333 CL, The Netherlands.
Jeroen Elassaiss-SchaapPD-Value, Utrecht 3584 CL, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3333-861X
Maria Joanna JuachonCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden 2333 CL, The Netherlands.
Karen BroekhuizenCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden 2333 CL, The Netherlands.
Hemme Jacob HijmaCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden 2333 CL, The Netherlands.
Geert Jan GroeneveldCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden 2333 CL, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pain management remains a major challenge due to the risks associated with conventional treatments, such as opioids and NSAIDs, which carry significant risks, including addiction, tolerance, and adverse side effects, particularly with prolonged use. Combining opioid with nonopioid drugs offer a potential solution, as it may minimize opioid-related side effects by reducing the required opioid dose. We performed a study to compare the analgesic effects and safety of a pregabalin-morphine combination to each drug alone and placebo in healthy volunteers. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design was used, with subjects receiving 300 mg of pregabalin combined with 3 and 7 mg of morphine, morphine only, pregabalin only, or a double placebo. Analgesic effects and CNS side effects were assessed up to 10 h postdose using nociceptive and neurocognitive test batteries. Results demonstrated that the pregabalin-morphine combination significantly increased pain tolerance compared to either drug alone on several pain tests (cold pressor, electrical burst, electrical stair, and pressure pain) with only minimal additional CNS side effects compared to monotherapy and placebo. This study indicates that validated nociceptive and CNS test batteries were suitable to assess the potential of opioid-sparing combination therapies in an experimental setting.

Identifiers

PMID40109754
PMCPMC11915181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.