Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40109732›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Beyond carrots and sticks. Exploring faculty motivation to join a digital health professions educator program.

Marwa Schumann, Martin Lehmann, Harm Peters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marwa SchumannDieter Scheffner Center for Medical Education, Dean's Office of Study Affairs, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Martin LehmannDieter Scheffner Center for Medical Education, Dean's Office of Study Affairs, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Harm PetersDieter Scheffner Center for Medical Education, Dean's Office of Study Affairs, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Faculty development programs in the health professions are essential in addressing the evolving and expanding roles of educators. These programs have become a cornerstone of organizational development and contribute significantly to improving student learning. However, the motivation of faculty to engage in such programs is often challenged by the significant demands of their clinical responsibilities and already busy schedules. This study aims to explore the motivation of teaching health professionals to voluntarily participate in the Digital Health Professions Education (d-HPE) program, a 200-h certification program at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin to train digital teaching skills and competencies. Methods: In this qualitative study, we analyzed the motivation letters from faculty members who volunteered to participate in the d-HPE program. We used coding based on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) as a framework for analysis with three main themes: autonomy, competence and relatedness. Within autonomy, the sub-themes were intrinsic motivation and self-directed choices. Competence included the sub-themes of mastery of teaching practices and digital skill development. Relatedness included the sub-themes of interprofessional collaboration and mentorship. Results: A total of 21 motivational letters were analyzed from two d-HPE cohorts, representing diverse health professional backgrounds and career stages. Analysis of the autonomy theme revealed an intrinsic motivation shaped by early teaching experiences and a self-directed decision to pursue advanced qualifications. The competence theme reflected the need to master evidence-based teaching practices and to develop advanced digital skills, with the COVID-19 pandemic as a driving factor. The relatedness theme demonstrated the importance of inter-professional collaboration and mentorship in promoting educational innovation across disciplines and institutions. Discussion: The motivation of health professions educators to participate in faculty development programs goes beyond the traditional 'carrots and sticks' of external rewards or punishments constellation; it is rooted in their intrinsic motivation to improve teaching qualifications and fulfill their role in digital education. Despite the demands of a busy clinical and professional work schedule, active engagement in intensive faculty development programs is aligned with the need for interprofessional networking and the evolving demands of digital education.

Indexed as

digital health professions educationfaculty developmentintrinsic motivationqualitative studyself-determination theory

Identifiers

PMID40109732
PMCPMC11919860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.