ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Mini review on skin biopsy: traditional and modern techniques.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in small tissue biopsies: diagnostic applications, histochemical integration, and methodological challenges in surgical pathology.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026Review
- High-quality histochemistry, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence on xylene- and formalin-free paraffin-embedded tissues.PloS one · 2026Article
- Peptide-Based Fluorescent Biosensing System for the Detection of the Melanoma Biomarker S100B.Bioconjugate chemistry · 2025Article
- Congenital and Neonatal Skin Disorders: Histopathological Diagnosis and Syndromic Associations.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of skin cancer continues to rise due to increased sun exposure and tanning habits, requiring early detection and treatment for favorable outcomes. Skin biopsy is an important diagnostic tool in dermatology and pathology, as it provides a valuable understanding of various skin diseases. Proper handling of skin biopsy specimens is vital to ensure accurate histopathological assessment. Still, the use of light microscopy and immunofluorescence provides a comprehensive approach to evaluating skin biopsy specimens, with each contributing unique information to aid in accurate diagnosis and management. This review highlights the evolution of skin biopsy practices, from traditional techniques to advanced methods incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) and convolutional neural networks. AI technologies enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, aiding in the rapid analysis of skin lesions and biopsies. Despite challenges such as the need for extensively annotated datasets and ethical considerations, AI shows promise in dermatological diagnostics. The future of skin biopsy lies in minimally invasive techniques, liquid biopsies, and integrated pharmacogenomics for personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.