Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40109694›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2025

Student Paramedic and Practice Educator Experiences of Ambulance Placements. A Rapid Evidence Review.

Joseph James Hudson Brown, Marishona Ortega, Gregory Adam Whitley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph James Hudson BrownSchool of Health and Care Science University of Lincoln Lincoln UK.
Marishona OrtegaLibraries and Learning Skills University of Lincoln Lincoln UK.
Gregory Adam WhitleySchool of Health and Care Science University of Lincoln Lincoln UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2586-6815

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ambulance practice placements overseen by paramedic practice educators form an essential aspect of training for student paramedics; however, this approach, adapted from other healthcare professions, is a relatively new model for paramedicine and evidence regarding its application in prehospital contexts is limited. Therefore, this rapid evidence review aimed to explore student paramedic and paramedic practice educator experiences of ambulance practice placements. Methods: EBSCOhost was used to search the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Complete and MEDLINE databases from inception to March 2024. Screening and data extraction was performed by one reviewer and verified by the second. Included studies were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist and thematic synthesis of results undertaken. Results: Of 134 records screened, seven were included in the review, representing 131 participants from the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Four themes were identified, including practice educator training and support, student-practice educator relationships, organization and communication, and operational factors. Conclusion: Outdated workplace practices, personal factors, education-industry barriers and unpredictable working environments impacted student paramedic and paramedic practice educator experiences of ambulance practice placements. Better communication is needed between universities and ambulance services to improve the consistency of ambulance practice placements for student paramedics and paramedic practice educators.

Indexed as

educationemergency medical servicesparamedicsstudents

Identifiers

PMID40109694
PMCPMC11919781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.