ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Salvage pulmonary embolectomy following cardiac arrest: a 10-year experience.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Outcomes of Surgical Pulmonary Embolectomy for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A 14-Year Single-Centre Study.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE), particularly massive PE, presents significant mortality risk, often necessitating emergency intervention such as surgical embolectomy. The prognosis for patients undergoing such interventions, especially after cardiac arrest, remains poor due to hemodynamic complications. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of salvage pulmonary embolectomy in patients experiencing cardiac arrest due to massive PE, focusing on survival outcomes and influential risk factors. Methods: Conducted at a single center over 10 years, this retrospective study involved 21 patients who underwent surgical embolectomy post-cardiac arrest due to massive PE. Data were collected on patient demographics, clinical presentation, and outcomes, analyzing factors such as age, hospital stay, and operative details. Results: Out of 21 patients, 13 survived 1 year post-operation, translating to a 1-year survival rate of 61.90%. Intra-hospital survival was 76.19% (16 patients). Notable findings included a significant association between increased age and higher mortality (hazard ratio = 1.14, Conclusion: Salvage pulmonary embolectomy can improve survival in patients with massive PE following cardiac arrest. However, outcomes heavily depend on the patient's age and the length of the hospital stay. Future studies should focus on refining surgical techniques and improving pre- and postoperative care to enhance survival rates further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.