ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Acute ischemic stroke revealing an internal carotid artery dissection in a 12-year-old child: case report and literature review.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection is a known cause of stroke but is often underdiagnosed in pediatric patients. Pediatric ischemic stroke significantly contributes to juvenile brain injury. Currently, there are no universally accepted guidelines for managing stroke in children. Case Presentation: We report the case of a 12-year-old girl who was admitted with sudden left hemiplegia and aphasia. Imaging revealed right carotid artery dissection and ischemic stroke in the right middle cerebral artery territory. She was managed with aspirin (75 mg/day) and enoxaparin (3000 IU/12 h) and remains under observation with persistent symptoms. Clinical discussion: This case highlights the difficulty in diagnosing ICA dissections in pediatric patients and the lack of clear guidelines for their management. The use of aspirin and enoxaparin represents an empirically-based therapeutic approach, underscoring the urgent need for further research to better understand the risk factors and pathogenic mechanisms of this condition. The persistence of symptoms in our patient also emphasizes the importance of close monitoring and individualized management. Conclusion: ICA dissection in pediatric stroke is hard to diagnose and treat. Research, empirically-based treatments, and personalized monitoring are crucial for better management and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.