ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Advances in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: the application of molecular biomarkers and imaging techniques: a literature review.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Testican-1 activates Wnt/β-Catenin signaling to drive colorectal cancer progression.Oncogenesis · 2026Article
- Elevated E2F6 Expression in Colorectal Cancer Tissues and Its Association With Clinicopathological Features.World journal of oncology · 2026Article
- Widening Health Inequality and Causal Metabolic Drivers in Global Colorectal Cancer: A Multi-Dimensional Study.Cancer informatics · 2026Article
- Tumor-Promoting Gut Microbes in Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms and Translational Perspectives.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Following neoplasms of the lung and breast, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent malignancy globally. Screening for CRC at the age of 50 years is strongly encouraged for prompt earlier diagnosis owing to prognoses being greatly correlated with time of detection and cancer staging. Aim: This review aimed to elucidate the most recent advancements in the detection of CRC, with an emphasis on the latest innovations in diagnostic molecular biomarkers in conjunction with radiological imaging alongside stool-based tests for CRC screening. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed, focusing on specific terms in different electronic databases, including that of PubMed/MEDLINE. Keywords pertaining to "colorectal cancer," "diagnosis," "screening," "imaging," and "biomarkers," among others, were employed in the search strategy. Articles screened and evaluated were deemed relevant to the study aim and were presented in the medium of the English language. Results: There have been several innovations in the diagnostics and identification of CRC. These generally comprise molecular biomarkers, currently being studied for suitability in disease detection. Examples of these include genetic, epigenetic, and protein biomarkers. Concurrently, recent developments in CRC diagnostics highlight the advancements made in radiological imaging that offer precise insights on tumor biology in addition to morphological information. Combining these with statistical methodologies will increase the sensitivity and specificity of CRC diagnostics. However, putting these strategies into reality is hampered by several issues. Conclusion: Progress in diagnostic technology alongside the identification of a few prognostic predictive molecular biomarkers suggested great promise for prompt detection and management of CRC. This clearly necessitates further efforts to learn more in this specific sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.