ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Revolutionizing electrocardiography: the role of artificial intelligence in modern cardiac diagnostics.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinically-aligned explainable AI for atrial fibrillation detection: A U-Net inspired multi-lead ECG analysis framework.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2026Article
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence in ECG Interpretation in the Outpatient Setting: A Scoping Review.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrocardiography (ECG) remains a cornerstone of non-invasive cardiac diagnostics, yet manual interpretation poses challenges due to its complexity and time consumption. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly through Deep Learning (DL) models, has revolutionized ECG analysis by enabling automated, high-precision diagnostics. This review highlights the recent advancements in AI-driven ECG applications, focusing on arrhythmia detection, abnormal beat classification, and the prediction of structural heart diseases. AI algorithms, especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), have demonstrated superior accuracy compared to human experts in several studies, achieving precise classification of ECG patterns across multiple diagnostic categories. Despite the promise, real-world implementation faces challenges, including model interpretability, data privacy concerns, and the need for diversified training datasets. Addressing these challenges through ongoing research will be crucial to fully realize AI's potential in enhancing clinical workflows and personalizing cardiac care. AI-driven ECG systems are poised to significantly advance the accuracy, efficiency, and scalability of cardiac diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.