ReviewBiomedical optics express2025
Visual simulation of intraocular lenses: technologies and applications [Invited].
Review in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Performance evaluation of a visual simulator for intraocular lenses].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Predictions of Through-Focus Performance of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses in Presbyopic Subjects Using a Visual Simulator.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- The Impact of Simulated Anisometropia and Bilateral Defocus on Reflex Vergence Responses of Children and Adults.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Factors Affecting Postoperative Satisfaction After Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lens.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Using Large Language Models for In Silico Development and Simulation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire for Cataract Surgery with Various Intraocular Lenses: A Pre-Validation Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- [Evidence-based approach for premium intraocular lenses: management of postoperative dissatisfaction].Die Ophthalmologie · 2025Review
- Introduction to the feature Issue "Improving Vision through Intraocular Lenses": a tribute to Jim Schwiegerling.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Improving the performance of multifocal diffractive lens designs by adding a peripheral piston.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cataract surgery requires selecting an intraocular lens (IOL), whose design affects visual outcomes. Traditional IOL evaluation relies on optical models and bench testing, but these methods fall short in simulating perceptual factors crucial to patient experience. Visual simulators, based on different principles including adaptive optics, temporal multiplexing or physical projection of the IOLs, now allow patients and clinicians to preview and compare different IOL designs preoperatively. By simulating real-world interactions of the eye's optics and the visual system with IOLs, these simulators enhance the patient decision-making process, enable personalized cataract surgery, and can aid in regulatory assessments of IOLs by incorporating pre-operative patient-reported visual outcomes. Visual simulators incorporate deformable mirrors, spatial light modulators and optotunable lenses as dynamic elements to simulate monofocal, multifocal and extended depth-of-focus IOLs, including newer designs aimed at improving contrast sensitivity, expanding depth of focus, and minimizing visual disturbances. With ongoing advancements, these simulators hold potential for transforming IOL design, regulatory processes, and patient care by providing realistic and patient-centered visual assessments, ultimately leading to more successful, individualized surgical outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.