ArticleBiomedical optics express2025
3D-printed fiber-bundle fluorescence microscope for quantifying single-cell responses to high-power radiofrequency sources.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Live, spatially-resolved imaging of absolute intracellular water content using holotomography.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Advances in Technology and Applications of Optical Sensing and Imaging for Biomedicine: introduction to the feature issue.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern telecommunications systems rely on the ubiquitous use of radiofrequency (RF) fields. To ensure the safety of living systems under RF exposure, standards have been developed which rely on observed thresholds that produce an adverse response. Unfortunately, real-time imaging of single-cell responses to high-peak power RF exposures is experimentally difficult, as high-power RF may damage sensitive electronics such as cameras or photodetectors, and any metal in the exposure zone (such as a microscope objective or translation stage) interacts with the RF by reflecting the RF field, acting as an antenna, or altering the dose delivered to the sample. In this work, we present a custom fluorescence microcopy system compatible with high-power RF environments. Our device uses a custom, 3D-printed objective consisting entirely of plastic and glass components as well as a coherent fiber bundle to relay light between the exposure zone and the fluorescence detection scheme. Our device was validated against a high-end commercial confocal microscope by comparing cellular responses to a well-characterized nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) stimulus delivered via an electrode pair. Our system performed well under extreme RF exposure, demonstrating continuous fluorescence imaging and maintenance of the focal plane despite >40°C temperature variation at the sample caused by high peak power free-field RF exposure at a frequency of 2.8 GHz. This system is intended to aid researchers in investigating real-time biological responses to radiofrequency and microwave sources.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.