Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40109490›Full record

ReviewJAACAP open2025

Systematic Review: Intervention Strategies for Treating Relational Aggression in Female Juvenile Offenders and At-Risk Female Youth.

Jenny Magram, Erica Ackerman, Claire Stafford, Tom D Kennedy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAACAP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jenny MagramNova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
Erica AckermanNova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
Claire StaffordNova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
Tom D KennedyNova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Female juvenile offenders commonly display a distinct form of aggression, known as relational aggression, which demands its own dedicated focus and specialized intervention approaches, as exemplified by the limited yet steadily growing body of research on the issue. This review set out to explore current relational aggression interventions specifically designed for incarcerated female youth, which was subsequently broadened to include at-risk female adolescents. Method: In stage 1, the effectiveness of intervention strategies targeting relationally aggressive behaviors in female juvenile offenders was systematically reviewed. As so few studies existed in the peer-reviewed literature, in stage 2, a review was conducted with a broader scope examining intervention strategies only with at-risk female adolescents. Results: The electronic databases JBI EBP, PsycINFO, and PubMed/MEDLINE were searched for the systematic review. At stage 1, 16 full-text articles were reviewed for quality, and of these articles, 13 were excluded due to sample population, outcomes, and lack of measuring correlates of relevant behavior. At stage 2, 12 full-text articles were reviewed for quality, and of these articles, 6 were excluded for the above-mentioned reasons. Conclusion: There are promising advancements in the development and implementation of interventions tailored to attenuate relationally aggressive behaviors in female youth deemed at risk or currently in the juvenile justice system.

Indexed as

at-risk female adolescentsfemale juvenile offendersinterventionrelational aggressiontreatment

Identifiers

PMID40109490
PMCPMC11914918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.