ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2025
[Predicting Intensive Care Unit Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure Combined With Acute Kidney Injury Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Model: A Retrospective Cohort Study].
Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Heart failure (HF) complicated by acute kidney injury (AKI) significantly impacts patient outcomes, and it is crucial to make early predictions of short-term mortality. This study is focused on developing an interpretable machine learning model to enhance early prediction accuracy in such clinical scenarios. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Ⅳ (MIMIC-Ⅳ, version 2.0) database. Data from the first 24 hours after admission to the ICU were extracted and divided into a training set (70%) and a validation set (30%). We utilized the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method to interpret the workings of an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model and identify key prognostic factors. The XGBoost model's predictive ability was evaluated against three other machine learning models using the area under the curve (AUC) metric, and its interpretation was enhanced using the SHAP method. Results: The study included 8028 patients with HF complicated by AKI. The XGBoost model outperformed the other models, achieving an AUC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.94; accuracy = 0.89), while neural network model showed the worst performance (AUC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.77-0.82; accuracy = 0.82). Decision curve analysis showed the superior net benefit of the XGBoost model within the 9% to 60% threshold probabilities. SHAP analysis was performed to identify the top 20 predictors, with age (mean SHAP value 1.29) and Glasgow Coma Scale score (mean SHAP value 1.24) emerging as significant factors. Conclusions: Our interpretable model offers an enhanced ability to predict mortality risk in HF patients with AKI in ICUs. This model can be used to assist in formulating effective treatment plans and optimizing resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.