Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40109427›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Peer support service activity prevalence by setting: a nine-state survey of peer workers.

Angela Hagaman, Hannah L Warren, Ruth Miller, Craig Henderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angela HagamanCollege of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States.
Hannah L WarrenCollege of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States.
Ruth MillerDepartment of Psychology and Philosophy, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, United States.
Craig HendersonDepartment of Psychology and Philosophy, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, United States.

Funding

Diversity Supplement: Building a Lasting Foundation to Advance Actionable Research on Recovery Support Services for High Risk Individuals with Opioid Use Disorder: The Initiative for JEAPR24DA051950 · NIDA · OREGON SOCIAL LEARNING CENTER, INC. · PI MCCART, MICHAEL R, SHEIDOW, ASHLI J · 2020 to 2025
$2.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R24 DA051950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Peer recovery support services (PRSS) are flexible, evidence-informed interventions that can be provided in a variety of settings and are delivered by credentialed people with lived-experience of mental health and substance use disorders. PRSS are a promising intervention that may increase linkage to care, treatment retention, and long-term recovery; however, there remains a sizable gap in the literature to disseminate these services to scale. Misunderstanding of the peer worker role, and a lack of consistent nomenclature to describe PRSS activities are barriers to studying PRSS effectiveness. Methods: This sequential exploratory mixed-methods study began with a qualitative and methodological review of a previous peer worker survey instrument by eight subject matter experts with lived experience of substance use disorder. The improved 38-item web-based survey was then disseminated to a non-probability sample of peer workers in nine U.S. states. Results: A total of 659 peer workers responded to the survey indicating that they perform an average of 24 different service activities most of the time ( Discussion: This study may be the first of its kind to explore the broad array of service activities peer workers perform in multiple settings across regional service networks, also known as recovery ecosystems. Notably, peer worker respondents selected an average of 24 activities that they perform most of the time, and Emotional support was the most commonly delivered support type. Study results provide preliminary evidence about where PRSS are performed within both macro and micro settings indicating that services are frequently delivered in non-clinical community-based settings and client homes which may confer added benefit. These results can be used to inform future studies that examine the effectiveness of PRSS across the continuum of care.

Indexed as

Peer GroupSocial SupportSubstance-Related DisordersAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesdrug abuse and addictionopioid use disorderpeer supportpeer workerpeer workforcerecovery supportssubstance use disorderSUD treatment

Identifiers

PMID40109427
PMCPMC11922078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.