ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Research on the impact of tourism cooperation on urban public health.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of public cultural participation on public health efficiency: empirical analysis from Chinese cities.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Does cultural service provision contribute to improving public health levels? Empirical evidence from 283 Chinese cities.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tourism cooperation is increasingly recognized as a key driver of regional economic development, playing a crucial role in facilitating internal circulation and enhancing urban public health. This study examines the relationship between tourism cooperation and urban public health development, with a focus on China. Methods: Using data from 284 Chinese cities over the period 2011-2022, this research measures both the degree of tourism cooperation and the level of urban public health development. Empirical analysis is conducted to assess the impact of tourism cooperation on urban public health outcomes. The study employs robustness tests to ensure the validity of its findings. Results: The findings indicate that tourism cooperation significantly promotes urban public health development. After conducting robustness tests, this result remains consistent. Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis reveals that the "core hinterland" type of tourism cooperation model has a stronger impact on urban public health development compared to the adjacent city type. Among different city cooperation models, tourism cooperation between central cities has the greatest empowering effect, followed by cooperation between central and non-central cities, while cooperation between non-central cities has the smallest effect. Discussion: The research suggests that tourism cooperation can effectively address regional economic disparities and the imbalanced development of urban public health in China. The findings have important implications for policy-making, particularly in promoting sustainable urban health development and narrowing regional gaps in economic and health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.