ArticleDigital health
Aged smart-care application program for promoting quality of life among older adults in the community: Study protocol of a three-arm randomized controlled trial.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To describe a study protocol for a three-arm randomized controlled trial that will evaluate the effectiveness of an Aged Smart-Care (ASC) application program intervention for community-dwelling older adults in China. Methods: This randomized controlled trial with three arms will be conducted at eight community health service centers. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: the interactive ASC (ASC + I) group, the regular ASC group, or the control group. The ASC + I group will receive management from a multidisciplinary medical team, while the regular ASC group will only utilize the ASC. The primary outcome will be assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey. The secondary outcomes include general self-efficacy, medication adherence, effectiveness of health behavior interventions, BMI, number of outpatient visits, and number of hospitalizations. Data will be collected at baseline, immediately post-intervention, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the intervention. Generalized estimating equations model will be employed for data analysis. Conclusions: This study clarifies the development process of the ASC and designs a three-arm randomized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of the ASC for older adults in the community. The results of the study will compare differences in the quality of life of participants in different groups. This will help community healthcare workers to choose appropriate interventions regarding the ASC. Furthermore, this provides scientific guidance for the Integrated Theory of Health Behavior Change theory in the field of mobile health tool development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.