Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40109383›Full record

ArticleRand health quarterly2025

Assessing Readiness in Service Members Who Receive Private-Sector Behavioral Health Care.

Jessica L Sousa, Kimberly A Hepner, Carol P Roth, Lia Pak, Teague Ruder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rand health quarterly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica L Sousa
Kimberly A Hepner
Carol P Roth
Lia Pak
Teague Ruder

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring that service members who receive behavioral health (BH) care receive routine readiness assessments is critical to maintaining a ready military force. Routine assessments of service members' medical readiness and deployability help identify any acute or chronic health conditions-physical or psychological-that could negatively affect a service member's ability to perform their military duties. Service members may receive BH care from a military treatment facility (MTF) provider (often referred to as direct care) or from a TRICARE-contracted civilian provider in the community (often referred to as private-sector care). While readiness assessments are routinely included in clinical encounters at MTFs, it has been unclear how readiness assessments are being conducted for service members seen in private-sector care. This study presents the findings and integration of two analyses-of administrative treatment data and of qualitative interviews with MTF administrators and clinical staff-that can inform policymaking and planning to improve readiness assessments and command communication for service members receiving private-sector BH care.

Indexed as

Health Care Quality MeasurementMental Health TreatmentMilitary Health and Health CareSubstance Use Disorder Treatment

Identifiers

PMID40109383
PMCPMC11916087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.