ArticlePain reports2025
Risk factors associated with the development and persistence of pain in adolescents: an international Delphi study.
Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relationships between Musculoskeletal Disorders, Sleep Impairment, and Cardiorespiratory Fitness among Adolescents Aged 15-19 Years in Douala, Cameroon: A Cross-sectional Study.International journal of school health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite significant advancements in research on paediatric pain, a consensus on the primary risk factors (RFs) for the development and persistence of pain in this population has not yet been reached. Objectives: This study aims to establish a consensus among experts on the most significant RFs for the onset and persistence of pain in adolescents. Methods: A modified international e-Delphi study with 4 rounds was conducted. An international and multidisciplinary panel of experts in paediatric pain and/or pain RFs was recruited. The experts were provided with 2 lists of potential RFs (1 for the onset, 1 for the persistence of pain) and were asked to rate the importance of each RF on a 5-point Likert scale. In each round, experts were asked to reconsider their answers in light of other experts' evaluations and comments. Results: A total of 43 experts participated in the study (33 completed all rounds). Forty-six RFs (out of 74) reached consensus for pain onset, and 4 were considered very important. Regarding the persistence of pain, consensus was reached on 56 out of 88 RFs. Eleven of these were found to be very important. Conclusion: This study generated consensus among experts on the importance of several RFs for the development and persistence of pain in adolescents. This consensus will be valuable in informing the design of future longitudinal studies, as well as treatment and preventive programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.