ArticlePain reports2025
Conditioned pain modulation elicited through manual pressure techniques on the cervical spine: a crossover study.
Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of manual therapy as a prophylactic treatment for migraine: a randomized controlled trial.Archives of physiotherapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Manual pressure techniques are commonly employed as a therapeutic approach for individuals experiencing musculoskeletal pain. The painful nature of these techniques suggests that a central mechanism known as conditioned pain modulation (CPM) might play a role. Objectives: This study tested whether a painful manual pressure technique (MPT) reduces pain sensitivity partly by eliciting a CPM effect. Methods: This crossover study examined 3 different conditioning stimuli: (1) a cold pressor test (CPT) with the contralateral hand submerged in a cold water bath, (2) painful MPT, and (3) sham-MPT on suboccipital muscles. We measured their effect on pain sensitivity using pressure pain thresholds at 3 locations: locally (suboccipital muscles), regionally (trapezius muscle), and remotely (tibialis anterior muscle). Results: In 63 healthy participants, no significant differences were found between the painful MPT and CPT on the pressure pain thresholds at all test locations: locally, -11 kPa (95% CI: 3 to -25); regionally, -15 kPa (95% CI: 10 to -39); and remotely, -24 kPa (95% CI: 55 to -7). Manual pressure technique compared to sham-MPT showed significant differences in the suboccipital muscles, -20.04 kPa (95% CI: -6.45 to -34.63) and the trapezius muscle, -38.24 (95% CI: -13.97 to -62.5) but no significant difference at the tibialis anterior muscle, -17.5 kPa (95% CI: 13.9 to -48.91). Conclusion: Painful MPTs applied at the suboccipital muscles reduce pain sensitivity at all sites, similar to the CPT, indicating CPM activation. Central pain inhibition might contribute to the effect of painful MPT in healthy people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.