Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40109369›Full record

ArticlePain reports2025

Multidimensional pain assessment and opioid use after total knee arthroplasty: continuous vs single-injection regional vs systemic analgesia.

Michael A Harnik, Oskar Oswald, Markus Huber, Debora M Hofer, Marcus Komann, Johannes Dreiling, Ulrike M Stamer

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02083835 (Improvement in Postoperative Pain Outcome), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02083835 recruitingnot on this map

Improvement in Postoperative Pain Outcome

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of JenaRan2009 to 2030Enrolled200,000ConditionsPost-operative Pain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael A HarnikDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0191-5742
Oskar OswaldDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Markus HuberDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Debora M HoferDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marcus KomannDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Johannes DreilingDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Ulrike M StamerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Effective pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential for recovery. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (PNBc) are often believed to provide superior pain relief compared with single-injection peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs). However, multidimensional pain-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have not been extensively studied. Objective: Based on registry data, this study compared pain intensities summarized as a pain composite score (PCS) and postoperative opioid use between PNBc and PNBs nerve blocks in patients undergoing TKA, and evaluated additional PROs. Methods: Data from 4,328 adults undergoing TKA enrolled in the PAIN OUT registry (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02083835) were analyzed. Patients were categorized into general anesthesia (GA) or spinal anesthesia (SA), with subgroups general anesthesia only (GA-o) or spinal anesthesia only (SA-o), and combinations with single-injection PNB (GA&PNBs and SA&PNBs) or continuous PNB via catheter (GA&PNBc and SA&PNBc). The primary end point was PCS, summarizing pain intensities and time in severe pain during the first 24 hours. Secondary end points included opioid use and additional PROs. Results: The use of GA&PNBc was associated with a higher PCS (+0.5 [0.0-0.9], Conclusion: Continuous PNBc showed no clear advantage over PNBs in pain relief, opioid use, or further PROs. Future research should incorporate comprehensive PROs to better evaluate analgesic techniques in TKA.

Indexed as

Assessment of pain/pain assessmentContinuous peripheral nerve blockMultidimensional pain scoresOpioid usePain-related patient-reported outcomesPeripheral nerve blockPostoperative pain managementTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40109369
PMCPMC11922405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.