Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40109314›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2025

Cost-effectiveness analysis of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy for adenoma detection and characterization in Spain.

Marco Bustamante-Balén, Beatriz Merino Rodríguez, Luis Barranco, Julen Monje, María Álvarez, Sofía de Pedro, Itziar Oyagüez, Nancy Van Lent, María Mareque

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marco Bustamante-BalénDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Beatriz Merino RodríguezEndoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Luis BarrancoEndoscopy Unit, Digestive Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Julen MonjeHealth Economics & Outcomes Research Unit, Medtronic Ibérica S.A., Madrid, Spain.
María ÁlvarezHealth Economics & Outcomes Research Unit, Medtronic Ibérica S.A., Madrid, Spain.
Sofía de PedroPharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Madrid, Spain.
Itziar OyagüezPharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Madrid, Spain.
Nancy Van LentHealth Economics & Outcomes Research, Medtronic International Trading Sarl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland.
María MarequePharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8438-4977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and study aims: The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of an intelligent endoscopy module for computer-assisted detection and characterization (CADe/CADx) compared with standard practice, from a Spanish National Health System perspective. Methods: A Markov model was designed to estimate total costs, life years gained (LYG), and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a lifetime horizon with annual cycles. A hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients eligible for colonoscopy (mean age 61.32 years) was distributed between Markov states according to polyp size, location, and histology based on national screening program data. CADe/CADx efficacy was determined based on adenoma miss rates and natural disease evolution was simulated according to annual transition probabilities. Detected polyp management involved polypectomy and histopathology in standard practice, whereas with CADe/CADx leave-in-situ strategy was applied for ≤ 5 mm rectosigmoid non-adenomas and resect-and-discard strategy for the rest of ≤ 5mm polyps. Unit costs (€,2024) included the diagnostic procedure and polyp and colorectal cancer (CRC) management. A 3% annual discount rate was applied to costs and outcomes. Model inputs were validated by an expert panel. Results: CADe/CADx was more effective (16.37 LYG and 14.32 QALYs) than standard practice (16.33 LYG and 14.27 QALYs) over a lifetime horizon. Total cost per patient was €2,300.76 with CADe/CADx and €2,508.75 with colonoscopy alone. In a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients, CADe/CADx avoided 173 polypectomies, 370 histopathologies, and 7 CRC cases. Sensitivity analyses confirmed model robustness. Conclusions: The results of this analysis suggest that CADe/CADx would result in a dominant strategy versus standard practice in patients undergoing colonoscopy in Spain.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerComputer-assisted characterization (CADx)Computer-assisted detection (CADe)CRC screeningEndoscopic resection (polypectomy, ESD, EMRc)Endoscopy Lower GI TractLeave-in-situPolyps, AdenomasResect-and-discard

Identifiers

PMID40109314
PMCPMC11922311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.