ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Professional benefits perception among pediatric nurses: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The perception of professional benefits is a critical determinant of job stability and work efficacy among healthcare professionals. This perception can directly influence patient care quality, nurse job satisfaction and retention, as well as overall organizational efficiency. The current understanding of how pediatric nurses perceive their professional benefits is limited. This study aimed to elucidate the status and determinants of professional benefit perception among pediatric nurses to inform evidence-based clinical care. Methods: We conducted a survey of pediatric nurses at our hospital from September 1, 2024, to November 26, 2024. Participants were selected using a convenience sampling method. The Nurses' Professional benefit perception Scale was employed to assess professional benefit perception. Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were utilized to identify factors influencing professional benefit perception. These statistical methods were chosen due to their suitability for examining relationships between continuous variables and for controlling potential confounding factors in the regression model. Results: A total of 366 pediatric nurses participated in the study. The mean score of professional benefit perception was (108.26 ± 17.32). Pearson correlation analysis revealed significant positive associations between professional benefit perception scores and several demographic and professional variables. Specifically, age ( Conclusion: The perceived level of professional benefits among pediatric nurses is found to be moderate. It is recommended that nursing administrators develop targeted intervention strategies based on the identified influencing factors. Such strategies may include enhancing professional development opportunities, improving financial compensation, and fostering a supportive work environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.