Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40109274›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2025

Effect of Lyophilised Sweet Potato on the Quality and Nutritional Characteristics of Set Yogurt.

Mehmet KIlinç, Gökhan Akarca, Ayşe Janseli Denizkara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mehmet KIlinçAsist. Prof. Dr. Faculty of Engineering, Food Engineering Department Afyon Kocatepe University Afyonkarahisar Turkey.
Gökhan AkarcaAssoc. Prof. Dr. Faculty of Engineering, Food Engineering Department Afyon Kocatepe University Afyonkarahisar Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5055-2722
Ayşe Janseli DenizkaraPh.D. Candidate Faculty of Engineering, Food Engineering Department Afyon Kocatepe University Afyonkarahisar Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3078-8914

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the functional properties of yogurts produced from two distinct lyophilized dried sweet potatoes and analyzed the temporal changes in those properties during storage. Adding purple and orange sweet potatoes had different effects on the changes in the quality, nutritional, microbiological, and functional properties of yogurt. These effects generally increased in parallel with the added amounts. At the end of storage, it was determined that the samples with 2% purple sweet potato added had the highest dry matter (8.45%), water holding capacity (50.90), DPPH radical scavenging effect (112.97%), and total phenolic substance (2.64 mg GAE/g) values. It was also determined that the richest samples in terms of mineral content were yogurts produced with the addition of 2% purple sweet potato, and the highest minerals were potassium (2,765,987.42 ppb), sodium (250,078 ppb), and magnesium (203,691.47 ppb), respectively. Similarly, it was determined that the textural properties were better in yogurt samples produced with a 2% purple sweet potato addition (the highest firmness (229.07 g) consistency (2690.00 g) cohesiveness (-81.70) and viscosity index (-290.54 g)). On the other hand, the highest oxalic (6.021 mg/kg), tartaric (26.068 mg/kg), formic (10,860 mg/kg), malic (196.11 mg/kg), ascorbic (10.75 mg/kg), and lactic acid (2762.83 mg/kg) values on the last day of storage were found in yogurts produced with a 2% orange sweet potato addition.

Indexed as

antioxidant effectnutritional valueseleniumtartaric acid

Identifiers

PMID40109274
PMCPMC11921013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.