ArticleHaematologica2025
Recognition, prevention, and management of adverse events associated with asparaginase/ pegaspargase treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults: consensus of an expert panel.
Article in Haematologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Asparaginase Hypersensitivity Reactions in NK/T-Cell Lymphomas.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Pegaspargase administration and tolerability in patients aged 55 years or older with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with the LAL1913 program. A subanalysis of the Campus ALL group.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Relapse risk and outcome of discontinuing asparaginase in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Asparaginase (ASNase)-based chemotherapy regimens significantly improve survival outcomes in children, adolescents and young adults (AYA), and even adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL); however, the incidence and severity of ASNase-associated adverse events (AE) in adults may differ significantly from those reported in children. Strategies to mitigate, monitor for, and manage toxicities that allow adult ALL patients to receive full ASNase courses are needed. A representative 12-member panel of experts who treat AYA and adult ALL patients, incorporate ASNase into their treatment regimens, and conduct related research was assembled to consider opportunities to optimize the use of pediatric-inspired ALL regimens in these adult patients. Following 2 systematic biomedical literature searches from April 2009 through April 2024, a modified Delphi method was used to distill expert opinion into clinical statements that met a standardized definition of consensus. After 2 iterative Delphi method surveys, 23 statements met the standardized definition of consensus, whereas 19 statements did not. Five statements were merged to avoid redundancy. The clinical statements were grouped into 5 distinct categories: 1) hepatotoxicity; 2) hypersensitivity reactions; 3) thromboembolic and coagulopathy complications; 4) pancreatitis and metabolic complications; and 5) dosing. The intent of these statements is to provide health care providers with information that will help them mitigate, monitor for, and manage the most common and/or unique ASNase-induced AE in adult ALL patients, allowing these patients to receive more or all the planned ASNase doses and thereby improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.