Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40109115›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

Workload distribution in wild Damaraland mole-rat groups.

Shay Rotics, Hanna M Bensch, Yehezkel S Resheff, Tim Clutton-Brock, Markus Zöttl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Division of labour as key driver of social evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Workload distribution in wild Damaraland mole-rat groups.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shay RoticsSchool of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, and the Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-3858-1811
Hanna M BenschKalahari Research Centre, Kuruman River Reserve, Van Zylsrus 8467, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8449-9843
Yehezkel S ResheffThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Business School, Jerusalem 91905, Israel.
Tim Clutton-BrockDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8110-8969
Markus ZöttlKalahari Research Centre, Kuruman River Reserve, Van Zylsrus 8467, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5582-2306

Funding

European Research CouncilHORIZON EUROPE European Research CouncilIsrael Science Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The social organization of Damaraland and naked mole-rats is often suggested to resemble the societies of eusocial insects more closely than that of any other vertebrate. Eusocial insects feature queens that hardly contribute to the workforce, and specialized worker castes. However, in Damaraland and naked mole-rats, which live in family groups with a single breeding pair and multiple non-breeding helpers, the work division is still unclear. Previous studies, largely confined to laboratory settings, could not quantify their primary cooperative behaviour, which is digging extensive foraging tunnels. Here, we studied the distribution of workload in 11 wild Damaraland mole-rat groups, using body acceleration loggers to evaluate behavioural time budgets of 86 individuals. We found behavioural differences between breeders and non-breeders that emerged with increases in group size, such that in large groups, breeders spent less time digging, more time resting, and were overall less active than non-breeders. We did not find any indication of a caste system among non-breeders, though the amount of time individuals spent digging varied with age and sex. Overall, the lower contribution by breeders to the group's workload is a pattern rarely observed in other cooperative vertebrates; nevertheless, the lack of evidence for castes suggests that eusociality may be limited to invertebrates.This article is part of the theme issue 'Division of labour as key driver of social evolution'.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalMole RatsSocial BehaviorAnimalsFemaleMalebody acceleration loggingcaste systemcooperative breedingeusocialityMammalsmole-ratsvertebrate societieswork division

Identifiers

PMID40109115
PMCPMC11923611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.