ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
Cultural evolution, social ratcheting and the evolution of human division of labour.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Division of labour as key driver of social evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Cultural evolution, social ratcheting and the evolution of human division of labour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While ecological specialization, social differentiation and division of labour are found in many species, extensive and irreversible interdependence among culturally specialized producers is a characteristic feature of humans. By extending the concept of cultural ratcheting (or the evolution of cultural products of such complexity that they become very unlikely to be recreated from scratch by naive individuals), we present simulation models showing how cumulative cultural evolution may have engendered a parallel process of 'social ratcheting' or the origin of culturally differentiated and irreversible interdependent individuals and groups. We provide evidence that the evolution of cultural division of labour in humans may have been associated with social network structures splitting the cognitive costs of cultural production across differentiated specialists, significantly reducing the burden of cultural learning on individual cognition and memory. While previous models often assumed agents with unlimited memories, we show that limiting individual memories to a fraction of available cultural repertoires has a noticeable accelerating effect on both cultural evolution and social differentiation among producers. We conclude that cultural and social ratcheting may have been two linked outcomes of cultural evolution in the hominin lineage.This article is part of the theme issue 'Division of labour as key driver of social evolution'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.