Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40109103›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

Division of labour during honeybee colony defence: poetic and scientific views.

Daniela Ramirez-Moreno, C Giovanni Galizia, Morgane Nouvian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Pheromone Landscape ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Division of labour as key driver of social evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniela Ramirez-MorenoDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz D-78457, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-9816-6489
C Giovanni GaliziaDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz D-78457, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8292-6031
Morgane NouvianDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz D-78457, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4882-2372

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poets, philosophers and politicians have used bees, and often projected an idealized human society into their view of how beehives are organized, from the ancient Greeks to present times. We first review how division of labour in honeybees was perceived by human observers, before presenting our current understanding. We focus specifically on defensive behaviour and show that this model provides an interesting case study for our conceptual understanding of division of labour as a whole. We distinguish three phases of the defensive response: detection of an intruder, recruitment of individuals into collective defence and attack. Individual bees may selectively contribute to one or more of these steps. Guard bees monitor entering conspecifics or attacking mammals, and release an alarm pheromone to recruit stinging soldiers. However, we are still far from understanding why only subsets of bees become guards or soldiers (or even if soldiering can be considered a task

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalSocial BehaviorAnimalsBeesHumansdefenceguard beeshoneybeesoldier bees

Identifiers

PMID40109103
PMCPMC11923620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.