Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40109028›Full record

ArticleJournal of evidence-based medicine2025

Medication Management in Patients With Polypharmacy in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Loes Engels, Marjan van den Akker, Petra Denig, Henri Stoffers, Heike Gerger, Jolijn Bohnen, Jesse Jansen

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evidence-based medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Loes EngelsDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5728-6773
Marjan van den AkkerDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Petra DenigDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Henri StoffersDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Heike GergerDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Jolijn BohnenDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Jesse JansenDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 839110022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInappropriate polypharmacy increases the risk of medication-related issues. Adequate management of polypharmacy is a challenge involving different healthcare professionals, complex decision-making and ideally including patient involvement. The objective of this scoping review was to provide an overview of national recommendations for medication management of patients with polypharmacy in primary care.

methodsA scoping review of clinical practice guidelines focusing on medication management in adults with polypharmacy, applicable to primary care was performed. Databases (G-I-N, Turning Research into Practice and PubMed), network, and a global report were screened for guidelines published after 2000 in English, Dutch, German, Spanish, French, or Russian. Raw data were extracted in duplicate using an extraction framework focusing on strategies, involvement of professionals, patient involvement, and implementation. Qualitative content analysis was used. Guideline quality was assessed using AGREE-II. The study was registered with the Open Science Framework.

resultsEight guidelines originating from eight countries were included. The most common recommended strategy was a medication review conducted by a general practitioner and/or a community pharmacist. Tasks and target population differed per guideline. Most guidelines recommended involving the patient in the process, mostly to elicit the patient's experiences and treatment goals. Few guidelines included advice on the implementation of recommendations. Three out of eight guidelines were of good quality (AGREE-II score >70% in 5/6 domains).

conclusionsMost guidelines recommended a medication review, with patient involvement, as a strategy for medication management in polypharmacy in primary care. Guidance on task division and implementation of guidelines in practice was less clear. This review illustrates room for guideline improvements.

Indexed as

PolypharmacyPractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary Health CareHumansPatient Participationmedication therapy managementpatient participationpolypharmacypractice guidelineshared decision‐making

Identifiers

PMID40109028
PMCPMC11923579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.