Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40108949›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2025

DanGer Shock-like profile predicts the outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock.

Norman Mangner, Johannes Mierke, Dominik Baron, Felix J Woitek, Stephan Haussig, Thomas Nowack, Ephraim B Winzer, Julia Fischer, Robert Höllriegel, Stefanie Jellinghaus and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Norman MangnerDepartment for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0793-7923
Johannes MierkeDepartment for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Dominik BaronDepartment for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Felix J WoitekDepartment for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Stephan HaussigDepartment for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Thomas NowackDepartment for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Ephraim B WinzerDepartment for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Julia FischerDepartment for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Robert HöllriegelDepartment for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Stefanie JellinghausDepartment for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Axel LinkeDepartment for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Heart Centre Dresden, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe DanGer Shock (DGS) trial demonstrated that the routine use of a microaxial flow pump (mAFP) with standard care to treat STEMI-related cardiogenic shock (STEMI-CS) led to a lower risk of all-cause death at 180 days than standard care alone. We investigated the impact of patient eligibility for DGS in an all-comers cardiogenic shock registry of patients receiving a mAFP. METHODS AND

resultsProspective single-centre mAFP registry including 478 CS-patients with 225 patients having STEMI-CS. DGS-like was defined as STEMI-CS, lactate ≥2.5 mmol/L, left ventricular ejection fraction < 45%, no mechanical complications, and no comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest but in-hospital cardiac arrest with a maximum of 10 min to return of spontaneous circulation as a surrogate for medically witnessed cardiac arrest was included. The comparison group consisted of STEMI-CS patients who did not fulfil the aforementioned criteria (DGS-unlike). The primary outcome was 180-day mortality. Out of 225 STEMI-CS, 64 (28.4%) patients were considered DGS-like. Those patients were younger, had less often received CPR before mAFP implantation, and mAFP-support was longer. Comorbidities, baseline lactate, coronary artery disease characteristics/treatment, inotropes/vasopressors, and escalation to other mechanical circulatory support devices were not different. All-cause mortality at 180 days was significantly lower in the DGS-like compared to the DGS-unlike cohort (62.5% vs. 72.0%, P = 0.014) as was 30-day all-cause mortality (48.4% vs. 70.2%, P < 0.001). DGS-like remained an independent predictor of both 180-day (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39, 0.83) and 30-day mortality (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32, 0.72) in a multivariable analysis.

conclusionsA DGS-like profile was associated with a lower 180-day mortality compared with a DGS-unlike profile in a STEMI-CS cohort treated by mAFP.

Indexed as

RegistriesShock, CardiogenicST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionStroke VolumeAgedCause of DeathFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesSurvival RateCardiogenic shockDanGer ShockMechanical circulatory supportMicroaxial flow pumpST‐elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID40108949
PMCPMC12287854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.