Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40108725›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2025

Histopathological and molecular characteristics of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma without contrast enhancement: Implications for clinical outcomes.

Martha Foltyn-Dumitru, Rouzbeh Banan, Marianne Schell, Mustafa Ahmed Mahmutoglu, Tobias Kessler, Wolfgang Wick, Gianluca Brugnara, Martin Bendszus, Felix Sahm, Philipp Vollmuth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Martha Foltyn-DumitruDivision for Computational Radiology & Clinical AI, Bonn University Hospital, Bonn, Germany.
Rouzbeh BananDepartment of Neuropathology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Marianne SchellDivision for Computational Neuroimaging, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mustafa Ahmed MahmutogluDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Tobias KesslerClinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8350-7074
Wolfgang WickClinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.
Gianluca BrugnaraDivision for Medical Image Computing (MIC), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin BendszusDivision for Computational Neuroimaging, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9094-6769
Felix SahmClinical Cooperation Unit Neuropathology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5441-1962
Philipp VollmuthDivision for Medical Image Computing (MIC), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6224-0064

Funding

AI Health Innovation Cluster of the Heidelberg-Mannheim Health and Life Science AllianceDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 1389Else Kröner Fresenius Foundation 2022_EKCS.17Else Kröner Research College for Young Scientist 2023_EKFK.02Heidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma (GB) heterogeneity poses substantial challenges for diagnosis and treatment. Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype GB may lack contrast enhancement on MRI and exhibit a "low-grade radiologic appearance" (non-contrast-enhancing [CE] GB), a phenomenon with unclear clinical implications. This study investigates the histopathological and molecular differences and survival outcomes between CE and non-CE GB.

methodsThis retrospective study at Heidelberg University Hospital analyzed 457 IDH-wildtype GB cases (09/2009-01/2021). Contrast enhancement on preoperative MRI was volumetrically assessed, classifying tumors as non-CE/CE GB using a 1 cm³ cutoff. Molecular and histopathological features, including microvascular proliferation, necrosis, and overall survival (OS), were compared between the groups.

resultsOf the initial cohort, 352 (77%) patients met the inclusion criteria, with 44 (12.5%) non-CE and 308 (87.5%) CE GB. The histopathological assessment revealed that non-CE GB was less likely to present traditional hallmarks of GB, such as microvascular proliferation (39% vs. 94%) and necrosis (25% vs. 92%) (P < .001). In the non-CE group, 24 patients (55%) were diagnosed as molecular GB, compared to only 8 patients (3%) in the CE group (P < .001). A significant difference was observed in Ki-67 levels, with non-CE GBs having a lower mean Ki-67 index of 18% ± 12% compared to 26% ± 13% in CE tumors (P < .001). The median OS was 27.2 months (95% CI, 19.8-NA) for non-CE and 14.7 months (95% CI, 13.2-17.1) for CE GB (P = .0049).

conclusionsIDH-wildtype GBs without contrast enhancement are often diagnosed based on molecular criteria due to less frequent histopathological hallmarks and are associated with prolonged OS.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overContrast MediaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate Dehydrogenasecontrast enhancementhistopathologyIDH-wildtype glioblastomalow-grade radiologic appearanceMRI

Identifiers

PMID40108725
PMCPMC12417822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.