Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40108717›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental evidence2025

Evidence of the impacts of pharmaceuticals on aquatic animal behaviour (EIPAAB): a systematic map and open access database.

Jake M Martin, Marcus Michelangeli, Michael G Bertram, Paul J Blanchfield, Jack A Brand, Tomas Brodin, Bryan W Brooks, Daniel Cerveny, Kate N Fergusson, Malgorzata Lagisz and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental evidence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Advancing the Spatiotemporal Dimension of Wildlife-Pollution Interactions.Environmental science & technology letters · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. No effect of a widespread pharmaceutical pollutant on behavior, physiology, or morphology in guppies.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Jake M MartinDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden. jake.martin@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9544-9094
Marcus MichelangeliDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0053-6759
Michael G BertramDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5320-8444
Paul J BlanchfieldFisheries and Oceans Canada, Freshwater Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0886-5642
Jack A BrandDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3312-941X
Tomas BrodinDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1086-7567
Bryan W BrooksDepartment of Environmental Science, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6277-9852
Daniel CervenyDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1491-309X
Kate N FergussonSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1043-1871
Malgorzata LagiszEvolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3993-6127
Lea M LovinDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1056-2045
Isaac Y LigockiDepartment of Biology, Millersville University, Millersville, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2014-0479
Shinichi NakagawaEvolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7765-5182
Shiho OzekiSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4480-8891
Natalia Sandoval-HerreraDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2546-8983
Kendall R ScarlettDepartment of Environmental Science, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4852-3614
Josefin SundinDepartment of Aquatic Resources, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Drottningholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1853-4046
Hung TanSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7500-8395
Eli S J ThoréDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0029-8404
Bob B M WongSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9352-6500
Erin S McCallumDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden. erin.mccallum@slu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5426-9652

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the last decade, pharmaceutical pollution in aquatic ecosystems has emerged as a pressing environmental issue. Recent years have also seen a surge in scientific interest in the use of behavioural endpoints in chemical risk assessment and regulatory activities, underscoring their importance for fitness and survival. In this respect, data on how pharmaceuticals alter the behaviour of aquatic animals appears to have grown rapidly. Despite this, there has been a notable absence of systematic efforts to consolidate and summarise this field of study. To address this, our objectives were twofold: (1) to systematically identify, catalogue, and synthesise primary research articles on the effects of pharmaceuticals on aquatic animal behaviour; and (2) to organise this information into a comprehensive open-access database for scientists, policymakers, and environmental managers.

methodsWe systematically searched two electronic databases (Web of Science and Scopus) and supplemented these with additional article sources. The search string followed a Population-Exposure-Comparison-Outcome framework to capture articles that used an aquatic organism (population) to test the effects of a pharmaceutical (exposure) on behaviour (outcome). Articles were screened in two stages: title and abstract, followed by full-text screening alongside data extraction. Decision trees were designed a priori to appraise eligibility at both stages. Information on study validity was collected but not used as a basis for inclusion. Data synthesis focused on species, compounds, behaviour, and quality themes and was enhanced with additional sources of metadata from online databases (e.g. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Taxonomy, PubChem, and IUCN Red List of Threatened Species). REVIEW

findingsWe screened 5,988 articles, of which 901 were included in the final database, representing 1,739 unique species-by-compound combinations. The database includes data collected over 48 years (1974-2022), with most articles having an environmental focus (510) and fewer relating to medical and basic research topics (233 and 158, respectively). The database includes 173 species (8 phyla and 21 classes). Ray-finned fishes were by far the most common clade (75% of the evidence base), and most studies focused on freshwater compared to marine species (80.4% versus 19.6%). The database includes 426 pharmaceutical compounds; the most common groups were antidepressants (28%), antiepileptics (11%), and anxiolytics (10%). Evidence for the impacts on locomotion and boldness/anxiety behaviours were most commonly assessed. Almost all behaviours were scored in a laboratory setting, with only 0.5% measured under field conditions. Generally, we detected poor reporting and/or compliance with several of our study validity criteria.

conclusionsOur systematic map revealed a rapid increase in this research area over the past 15 years. We highlight multiple areas now suitable for quantitative synthesis and areas where evidence is lacking. We also highlight some pitfalls in method reporting and practice. More detailed reporting would facilitate the use of behavioural endpoints in aquatic toxicology studies, chemical risk assessment, regulatory management activities, and improve replicability. The EIPAAB database can be used as a tool for closing these knowledge and methodological gaps in the future.

Indexed as

EcotoxicologyEvidence synthesisFitnessMedicineNeurotoxicologyPsychoactive

Identifiers

PMID40108717
PMCPMC11924672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.