Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40108682›Full record

ReviewCardio-oncology (London, England)2025

Dexrazoxane makes doxorubicin-induced heart failure a rare event in sarcoma patients receiving high cumulative doses.

Haoyi Zheng, Huichun Zhan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haoyi ZhengThe Heart Center, Saint Francis Hospital, 100 Port Washington Blvd, Roslyn, NY, 11576, USA. Haoyi.Zheng@chsli.org.
Huichun ZhanDepartment of Medicine, Stony Brook School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doxorubicin remains a cornerstone in sarcoma treatment, but its dose-dependent cardiotoxicity limits its clinical use and therapeutic potential. Dexrazoxane, the only FDA-approved cardioprotective agent, has demonstrated substantial efficacy in preventing doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. However, despite its proven benefits, dexrazoxane remains underutilized not only in clinical practice but also in contemporary trials. This review examines the role of dexrazoxane in recent oncology trials involving sarcoma patients treated with high cumulative doses of doxorubicin. The LMS 04 trial, a contemporary phase 3 sarcoma trial in which dexrazoxane use was prohibited, reported a 5.4% heart failure incidence at cumulative doxorubicin doses of 360-450 mg/m². In contrast, the trials, where dexrazoxane was used early or upfront, demonstrated rare heart failure incidences even at cumulative doses exceeding 600 mg/m², which is well beyond the conventional maximal limit. Additionally, dexrazoxane enables the safe administration of cumulative doxorubicin doses exceeding 1000 mg/m² without increasing cardiotoxicity. Concerns about secondary malignancies and reduced anti-tumor efficacy have not been supported by clinical trials and meta-analyses. The routine upfront use of dexrazoxane should be considered with doxorubicin treatment, especially in those requiring high cumulative doses or patients at high risk of cardiotoxicity, as each dose of doxorubicin incrementally contributes to the development of cardiotoxicity. Dexrazoxane not only mitigates cardiotoxicity but also allows for extended doxorubicin dosing, maximizing its therapeutic potential. Awareness and guideline updates are necessary to ensure its broader adoption in clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID40108682
PMCPMC11921489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.