ArticleBMC veterinary research2025
Establishment and characterization study of ovine mammary organoids.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Animal organoids as models for integrated One Health research.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Review
- A nine-gene signature with potential targets for predicting the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe study of ovine lactation and mastitis is limited by the lack of physiologically relevant in vitro models. Compared to mammary epithelial cells, mammary gland organoids (MaOs) offer a better model for studying lactation, as they more accurately replicate the tissue structure and interactions of cells in vivo. Here, we optimize a protocol for the isolation, culture, characterization, and transfection of ovine MaOs derived from ewe mammary tissue.
resultsWe compared different enzymatic digestion methods and found that type IV collagenase digestion for 60 min yielded the highest number of MaOs compared to a mixed enzyme solution of type II collagenase and hyaluronidase. Culture medium optimization revealed that medium B supported superior growth, with increased budding structures, a higher number of MaOs over time, and a greater proportion of EdU-positive proliferating cells compared to media A and C. Cell-type characterization confirmed the presence of both luminal and myoepithelial cells, as shown by RT-PCR analysis of CK14, CK18, and CK7 expression, and further validated by immunofluorescence staining for CK14 and CK18. MaOs in medium B exhibited significantly higher mRNA expression levels of milk lipid metabolism-related genes (XDH, FABP3, SREBP1), lactose metabolism-related genes (GLUT1, GLUT4), and milk protein synthesis genes (EIF4E, CSN2) at multiple time points. In all media, XDH, FABP3, SREBP1, GLUT1, GLUT4, EIF4E, and CSN2 mRNA expression peaked at Day 7 before declining. Additionally, at Day 7, supernatant analysis confirmed that triglyceride, lactose, and CSN2 concentrations were significantly elevated in medium B compared to media A and C. Finally, we demonstrated that the ovine MaOs could be transfected using electroporation with 27.3% becoming GFP-positive.
conclusionsThis study establishes a protocol for the isolation, culture, characterization, and genetic manipulation of ovine MaOs. These organoids serve as a physiologically relevant model for studying the regulatory mechanisms of lactation and mastitis in sheep, providing a tool for future research in veterinary and agricultural sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.