Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40108658›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Illness perception and resilience in patients with cancer: a cross-sectional study.

Reza Shabanloei, Mostafa Ghasempour, Reza Zamanesazi, Majid Purabdollah, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. On the origins of childhood cancer.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Reza ShabanloeiDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, 51389-47977, Iran.
Mostafa GhasempourDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, 51389-47977, Iran. Ghasempourm@tbzmed.ac.ir.
Reza ZamanesaziDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, 51389-47977, Iran.
Majid PurabdollahDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Khoy University of Medical Sciences, Khoy, Iran.
Mohammad Asghari-JafarabadiCabrini Research, Cabrini Health, Malvern, VIC, 3144, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer is the second leading cause of death after cardiovascular diseases and is considered a debilitating and incurable condition. Following diagnosis, individuals often experience anxiety, depression, and diminished social energy. Therefore, identifying factors that influence the psychological state of these patients and intervening to improve their well-being is crucial.

aimThis study aims to examine the relationship between illness perception and resilience in cancer patients visiting healthcare centers.

methodsThe study was conducted in a cross-sectional design, involving 262 cancer patients selected through stratified random sampling from two public and two private oncology treatment centers in Tabriz, Iran. Data were collected using a demographic checklist, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), and the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). Data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (V.20) at a significance level of 0.05. Statistical methods included descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, t-test, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression to examine relationships between demographic variables, illness perception, and resilience.

resultsThe majority of participants in the study were male (74%), married (72%), suffering from gastrointestinal cancers (62%), with an average age of 40.9 (SD: 11.9) years. The average overall resilience score was 60.1 (SD: 16.6). Pearson correlation results showed a significant positive correlation between overall resilience and the subscales of illness identity (r = 0.26, p < 0.001), consequences of illness (r = 0.20, p < 0.001), personal control (r = 0.47, p < 0.001), treatment control (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), and time line cyclical (r = 0.33, p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed that illness Identity (B = 0.94, CI [0.43, 1.44], p < 0.001), personal control (B = 1.75, CI [1.30, 2.21], p < 0.001), treatment control (B = 2.37, CI [1.87, 2.88], p < 0.001), and time line cyclical (B = 0.30, CI [0.40, 1.01], p = 0.04) significantly predicted resilience.

conclusionThe findings suggest that improving patients' understanding and control over their illness may enhance their psychological resilience. These results highlight the importance of patient education and psychological interventions in cancer care, aimed at strengthening personal control and resilience. Integrating these strategies into standard care has the potential to improve patients' ability to cope with the psychological challenges of cancer and ultimately lead to an enhanced quality of life.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthNeoplasmsResilience, PsychologicalAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesCancerIllness perceptionPerceptionQuality of lifeResilience

Identifiers

PMID40108658
PMCPMC11924744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.