ArticleBMC psychology2025
Illness perception and resilience in patients with cancer: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- "A machine that won't shut down, a clogged pipe": a qualitative study on the lived experience and integrative coping strategies of Chinese cancer patients with insomnia and cognitive impairment.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- On the origins of childhood cancer.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Article
- "Fear Has Big Eyes": Illness Perception, Fear of Recurrence, and Generalized Anxiety in Post-Treatment Thoracic Cancer Patients: A Serial Multiple Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Ego-resilience and health-related quality of life after acquired Upper Limb Amputation.PloS one · 2026Article
- Association between psychological resilience and global health status/quality of life in patients with brain metastases after resection of primary non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The Mediating Role of Patient Activation in the Association Between Illness Perception and Self-Management Behavior Among Patients with Oral Cancer.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Social Support and Psychological Capital in Older Adults with Esophageal and Gastric Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- Profiles of resilience and patient activation among patients with colorectal cancer and an enterostomy: A latent profile analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- The impact of illness perception on self-transcendence in gastric cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: the chain mediating effect of hope levels and coping styles.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCancer is the second leading cause of death after cardiovascular diseases and is considered a debilitating and incurable condition. Following diagnosis, individuals often experience anxiety, depression, and diminished social energy. Therefore, identifying factors that influence the psychological state of these patients and intervening to improve their well-being is crucial.
aimThis study aims to examine the relationship between illness perception and resilience in cancer patients visiting healthcare centers.
methodsThe study was conducted in a cross-sectional design, involving 262 cancer patients selected through stratified random sampling from two public and two private oncology treatment centers in Tabriz, Iran. Data were collected using a demographic checklist, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), and the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). Data analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (V.20) at a significance level of 0.05. Statistical methods included descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, t-test, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression to examine relationships between demographic variables, illness perception, and resilience.
resultsThe majority of participants in the study were male (74%), married (72%), suffering from gastrointestinal cancers (62%), with an average age of 40.9 (SD: 11.9) years. The average overall resilience score was 60.1 (SD: 16.6). Pearson correlation results showed a significant positive correlation between overall resilience and the subscales of illness identity (r = 0.26, p < 0.001), consequences of illness (r = 0.20, p < 0.001), personal control (r = 0.47, p < 0.001), treatment control (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), and time line cyclical (r = 0.33, p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed that illness Identity (B = 0.94, CI [0.43, 1.44], p < 0.001), personal control (B = 1.75, CI [1.30, 2.21], p < 0.001), treatment control (B = 2.37, CI [1.87, 2.88], p < 0.001), and time line cyclical (B = 0.30, CI [0.40, 1.01], p = 0.04) significantly predicted resilience.
conclusionThe findings suggest that improving patients' understanding and control over their illness may enhance their psychological resilience. These results highlight the importance of patient education and psychological interventions in cancer care, aimed at strengthening personal control and resilience. Integrating these strategies into standard care has the potential to improve patients' ability to cope with the psychological challenges of cancer and ultimately lead to an enhanced quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.